(Submitted November 03, 2006)
The Hubble Ultra Deep Field is a snapshot of (that small section) of the galaxy
13 billion years ago. This means that the light that composed the image
travelled 13 billion light years, and hence the source is currently ~13
billion light years away. If we say that the universe is 13.7 billion
years old, then the observable universe is roughly 13.7 billion light
years in radius.
Therefore when the light was emitted, we can assume the observable universe was
700 million light years in radius. Which means that the source should also have
been within 1.4 billion light years of Earth. So unless the source and Earth
were expanding away from each other at nearly 9/10ths the speed of light, which
is obviously untrue...how come the light for this photo didn't pass us billions
of years ago?
That is a good question and it shows the difficulties and non-intuitive nature
to some aspects of our universe. We really would like to have an absolute
reference frame to measure all things against, but it just doesn't exist.
It is also easy to get confused about distances and time in cosmology, because
there are different definitions used in different situations, or by different
authors. As Prof. Ned Wright says, "The time and distance used in the Hubble
law are not the same as the x and t used in special relativity, and this often
leads to confusion." See:
Some parts of the universe are outside of our horizon, and since the expansion
appears to be speeding up, these will never be observable to us.
Some detailed references are:
- Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the
superluminal expansion of the Universe
- No Superluminal Expansion of the Universe
Hope this helps,
Tom, Koji, Andy, Tess and Mike for "Ask an Astrophysicist"