Imagine the Universe!
Imagine Home  |   Ask an Astrophysicist  |  
Ask an Astrophysicist

The Question

(Submitted May 16, 1997)

Several individuals have told me that they have read an article(s) in the newspapers recently (either 15 may or 14 May) regarding the detection of a gamma-ray that was a mother of all gamma-rays. According to these individuals the gamma-ray came from a source that that had an energy content larger than that of the energy contained in the known universe! I don't doubt the story (unfortunately I did not see the article) up to a point. I'm sure a powerful gamma-ray was detected but I question the stated energy content. Would you please clarify the stated energy content (was this gamma-ray detected by NASA astronomers?) and tell me where I may obtain up-to-date information regarding this detection of such a powerful gamma-ray.

The Answer

My colleague David Palmer provided the enclosed answer to your question.

Jim Lochner
for Ask an Astrophysicist


I believe the newspaper articles were referring to the recent discovery of a gamma-ray burst counterpart with a high redshift. This source, for a few seconds, produced over a million times as much power as our entire Galaxy, although much less than the rest of the Universe as a whole.

Pictures are at
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap970521.html

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap970513.html

The details:

About once a day, there is a sudden flash of gamma-rays coming from some random point in the sky. A Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) is often the brightest source in the sky, often brighter than everything else combined. When they were discovered a quarter century ago, it was immediately 'obvious' that the sources of these GRBs must be relatively nearby in space, otherwise they would have to produce ridiculous amounts of energy in order to be so bright.

As better and better instruments were flown, more and more data accumulated indicating that these GRBs were distant. Rather than believing that the sources we see were in our little corner of our Galaxy, the astronomical community was split into those who believed that GRB sources were out at the distant fringes of our Galaxy, and those who believed that GRBs were at cosmological distances, far out in the Universe. The Galactic camp required that GRBs were merely ridiculously bright, but the cosmological camp required GRB energies that were completely ludicrous--as much energy as a supernova, released in seconds, and all of it in gamma-rays. (And this ignores the fact that it is very hard to make gamma-rays efficiently, so it may require hundreds to thousands of times more total energy to get that much gamma-ray energy out.)

One reason why GRBs were so mysterious is that nobody had seen them emit anything but gamma-rays, and gamma-rays are hard to work with. You can't focus them with mirrors or lenses, so it's very hard to tell where they are coming from to better accuracy than a degree or so. If you have a 1 degree position, you can look at it with modern telescopes (although you will usually have to look at a small region, move the telescope, look at another small region, etc. since 1 degree is a huge area of the sky in modern terms) and you will see many many different objects. The problem is, you will not be able to tell which of those objects, if any, is the source of the GRB.

Recently, the BeppoSAX spacecraft was launched by ESA. This spacecraft has an instrument that can locate GRBs (if they fall in its 40 x 40 degree field of view) to within about 10 arcminutes. It also has an X-ray telescope which, if pointed to an accuracy of 10 arcminutes, will see a dim X-ray source and locate it with an accuracy of an arcminute.

Three times this instrument has seen a GRB with its first instrument and, within 8 hours, pointed its X-ray telescope and seen a fading source which it could locate to within an arcminute. On two of these occasions, people using big optical telescopes have seen points of light flare up and die down at the right location. These points of light are very faint (20th magnitude) but with large telescopes such as the Hubble Space Telescope, Mount Palomar, and Keck Observatory they can be studied.

The latest optical source has lines in its spectrum which imply that it is at a redshift of z = 0.8, about halfway across the Universe. The BATSE instrument on The Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory measured this GRB as well, and reports a flux (at Earth) which reached a maximum of 1.7 x 10-7ergs/cm2/s. This gives a total peak power of a few x 1050 ergs/second, and over the 35 second duration of the burst, it produced a few x 1051 ergs.

To get a feeling for this, our entire galaxy produces about 3 x 1043 ergs/second at all wavelengths (mostly optical). Therefore, this gamma-ray burst object was millions of times as bright as our galaxy. That's pretty bright, but there are maybe 10 to 100 billion galaxies in the Universe. So the gamma-ray burst was about a 10,000th as bright as the entire Universe.

So it was millions of times brighter than our Galaxy, the brightest thing in the entire Universe for a few seconds, and was a significant fraction of the brightness of the Universe, but the press is once again guilty of exaggeration.

David Palmer

Previous question
Prev
Main topic
Main
Next question
Next

If words seem to be missing from the articles, please read this.

Imagine the Universe! is a service of the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), Dr. Alan Smale (Director), within the Astrophysics Science Division (ASD) at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.

The Imagine Team
Project Leader: Dr. Barbara Mattson
Curator: Meredith Gibb
Responsible NASA Official: Phil Newman
All material on this site has been created and updated between 1997-2014.
This page last updated: Thursday, 01-Dec-2005 13:58:40 EST